ArticlePloS one2026
Determinants of husbands' involvement in family planning: Evidence from a community-based cross-sectional study in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We argue that the husband's involvement in family planning (FP) should encompass a larger role such as participation in the joint decision-making on FP and supporting their wives in contraceptive use, rather than just being FP clients. This study assessed husbands' involvement in decision-making of family size and contraceptive use and examined factors associated with such involvement in two districts of Uttar Pradesh, India among husbands of 1,258 currently married women of reproductive age. The study considered a set of demographic, socio-economic, attitudinal, and programmatic variables to explain the variation in the husbands' involvement in FP. We have applied latent class analysis to identify classes based on the attitude of husbands towards FP and contraceptive use. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of the husbands are involved in decision-making on family size and over half (56%) of the husbands are involved in supporting their wives' contraceptive use. Having a positive attitude toward FP and contraceptive use along with media exposure to FP were the most significant determinants for husbands' involvement in FP to decide family size (AOR = 4.18, 95% CI 2.96-5.88) and support wives' contraceptive use (AOR = 3.98, 95% CI 2.82-5.61) even after adjusting for the factors like parity, religion, and having a son. The FP program should consider strategies involving husbands with positive attitudes across social and religious groups to popularize FP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.