ArticlePloS one2026
Biomonitoring in the Anthropocene: Urban estuary environmental DNA tracks marine fish, terrestrial wildlife, and human diet.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managing anthropogenic impacts in urban estuaries asks for up-to-date monitoring of marine life. Here we analyze vertebrate eDNA in New York City's East River, a rocky estuary channel difficult to survey with mechanical gear and subject to wastewater discharge. We collected water samples weekly for one year and applied spike-in metabarcoding to quantify vertebrate eDNA. Replication experiments demonstrated good reproducibility above about 10 eDNA copies/PCR. We propose a fish censusing scale based on absolute eDNA abundance. Local marine fish eDNA followed a classic hollow curve species abundance distribution over four orders of magnitude, with abundant and common taxa comprising about 25% of species and 95% of fish eDNA. There was a 10-fold increase in local marine fish eDNA in summer and seasonal differences among taxa consistent with known phenology. Two fish species were newly abundant in comparison to an eDNA survey at the same site in 2016. Levels of other vertebrate eDNA-domesticated animal, non-fish wildlife, and dietary fish-were correlated with human eDNA levels, consistent with a shared wastewater source. Wastewater eDNA identified the commonest urban mammals, land birds, and household pets. Proportions of dietary animal eDNA in wastewater closely approximated proportions in national consumption statistics, opening a window into human diet assessment. Effort and cost for the weekly shoreline survey were modest. Vertebrate eDNA metabarcoding with spike-in quantification enabled weekly monitoring of urban estuary fish populations, identified overlooked newly abundant species, and reported on terrestrial wildlife and human diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.