ArticlePloS one2026
Auditing the impact of social media's policy shift on anti-vaccine discourse: A large language model-driven empirical study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sudden termination of X's (formerly Twitter) misinformation policy on November 23, 2022, provides an opportunity to assess the effects of lifting content moderation restrictions on vaccine-related discourse. This study examines changes in the prevalence, thematic composition, and engagement of anti-vaccine discourse following X's policy shift, analyzing tweets from a seven-day period before and after the policy termination (November 16-30, 2022), excluding the announcement date itself from regression analyses. Using GPT-4o for stance classification, thematic categorization, and stance consistency assessment, with validation through external benchmarks and cross-annotator agreement, we find that anti-vaccine tweets increased significantly post-policy (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.50-1.72), particularly via retweets, suggesting content amplification. Sensitivity analyses excluding highly retweeted content revealed that the policy change was also associated with increased creation of new anti-vaccine content. Thematically, health concerns over vaccination became more prominent, while conspiracy-related and anti-mandate narratives declined in relative prevalence. Stance consistency in quote tweets increased, indicating reinforced ideological alignment in anti-vaccine discourse. These results suggest that content moderation policies may constrain both the volume and amplification of anti-vaccine content, with policy removal associated with rapid shifts in discourse patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.