ArticlePloS one2026
No-take marine reserves boost the resilience of commercial fish from the catastrophic effects of a volcanic eruption.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Submarine volcanic eruptions are strong pulse disturbances that can cause abrupt mortality and long-lasting changes in marine communities. In October 2011, a submarine eruption off El Hierro (Canary Islands, Spain) generated a sulphurous plume that affected the Punta de La Restinga-Mar de Las Calmas Marine Reserve and surrounding coastal areas. Using a 25-year time series of fish community data, we assessed post-disturbance trajectories of commercial species across different protection levels within the impacted region. Resilience was analyzed as a sequential process, partitioned into resistance (initial biomass loss), recovery trajectory (temporal trend after the disturbance), and relative recovery compared with pre-eruption conditions. Because all sites were affected by the volcanic plume, our inference is restricted to comparative differences among protection categories rather than to the absolute effectiveness of protection. The no-take zone showed higher relative resistance and faster positive trajectories in total fish biomass than less-protected areas, indicating more favorable post-disturbance dynamics. However, eight years after the eruption, community structure had not fully returned to pre-eruption conditions in any protection level, reflecting contrasting recovery times among species with different life histories. Fast-growing species such as the parrotfish Sparisoma cretense recovered rapidly, whereas long-lived predators such as Epinephelus marginatus remained below their pre-disturbance biomass. Our results provide a long-term, community-level comparison of post-volcanic recovery within a marine reserve and highlight how protection status is associated with differences in recovery dynamics under a rare natural disturbance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.