Trial reportPloS one2026
Effects of executive function training on balance and auditory-cognitive dual-task performance in adults with and without hearing loss.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05418998 (Training Cognition to Improve Mobility and Listening in Older Adults with Hearing Loss), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Training Cognition to Improve Mobility and Listening in Older Adults with Hearing Loss: Moving from Lab to Life
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulated hearing loss in healthy young and older adults results in poor reaction time in older adults.Pacific journal of health (Stockton, Calif.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultitasking, such as listening while balancing, relies on integrated processing in the sensory, cognitive, and motor systems; systems that often decline with age. Hearing loss is linked to increased risks of both falls and cognitive decline. Improving cognitive processing through executive function (EF) training may support balance, especially in older adults with hearing loss. This randomized controlled study conducted across age groups and hearing abilities, examined the effects of a 12-week EF training program on postural outcomes (center of pressure (COP)) using an auditory-cognitive-postural dual-task paradigm.
methodsSixty-five participants including middle-aged adults with normal hearing (MA; n = 19), older adults with normal hearing (OA; n = 23), and older adults with hearing loss who used hearing aids (OAHL; n = 23) were randomly assigned within each age group to an EF training condition or a control condition. Primary outcome measures were auditory-cognitive reaction time on an auditory 2-back working memory task and postural measures (COP path length variability), which were collected in single- and dual-task conditions. Secondary analyses examined whether sensory, cognitive, and mobility performance, as evaluated by baseline standardized assessments, predicted training-related outcomes.
resultsAcross MA, OA, and OAHL groups, cognitive performance generally improved following EF training and transfer of these training effects were observed during experimental postural tasks and auditory-cognitive tasks, but differed depending on age, pure-tone hearing thresholds, and cognitive abilities. Specifically, for postural outcomes, performance improved after training, but only for older adults with better hearing, while those with poorer hearing at any age did not improve. For auditory-cognitive task performance, older adults with the poorest hearing and cognition benefited the most from training.
conclusionsEF training may support balance and cognition in older adults, although its benefits for balance may be limited by severe hearing loss, underscoring the value of early intervention.
trial registrationRegistry Name: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration/Trial number: NCT05418998. Trial URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05418998.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.