ArticlePloS one2026
Temporal evolution of the environmental footprints of intensive farming across England.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal evolution of the environmental footprints of intensive farming across England.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The agriculture sector continues to face expectations regarding documenting its unintended environmental footprints through time given increasing awareness of the need to deliver food more sustainably. Accordingly, the work reported in this paper used a process-based modelling framework evaluated previously to examine the temporal evolution (2010, 2016, 2021) of the environmental footprints of intensive farming systems across England. The results were computed at Water Management Catchment scale given the use of this spatial unit for policy reporting purposes. Environmental footprints focused on Global Warming Potentials over 20- (GWP20) and 100-year (GWP100) horizons, eutrophication potential (EP) and acidification potential (AP). Both GWP20 and GWP100 were included to characterise the short- and long- term impacts. Important structural changes in agriculture included a 3.7% increase in the area of land under 'general cropping' and a 2% reduction in that under dairy. There was a corresponding reduction of the registered cattle populations by 4% in 2016 and 12% in 2021, relative to 2010. At the same time, the number of sheep and lambs increased by 9% in 2016 and 4% in 2021. These farm structure changes in 2021 were computed to result in respective median reductions in GWP100, EP and AP of 18%, 13% and 21% compared with 2010. Eutrophication potential exhibited lower overall reductions wherein 28 water management catchments exhibited <5% reductions, with a maximum reduction of ~45%. In comparison, corresponding maximum reductions in GWP20, GWP100 and AP were modelled at 76%, 64% and 54%, respectively, with 17, 15 and 7 water management catchments exhibiting <5% reductions. Modelling suggests a downward change in environmental footprints but there are challenges in directly linking predicted temporal trends with existing and available monitored data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.