ArticleEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape2026
Can epilepsy be predicted after the first febrile seizure? Insights from machine learning of postictal EEG.
Article in Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFebrile seizures (FS) are the most common seizures in childhood, yet identifying children at risk of developing epilepsy after the first FS remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to post-febrile seizure electroencephalography (EEG) recordings.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 104 children (69 boys; mean age at first febrile seizure: 39.4 ± 18.2 months) who presented with their first febrile seizure between January 2018 and December 2021. Clinical data and EEG recordings obtained during N2 sleep were collected. EEG analysis was performed using separate preprocessing pipelines. For conventional EEG analysis, recordings were band-pass filtered between 1 and 40 Hz, and artifact-free segments were analyzed using Python-based pipelines (YASA, MNE) to extract 34 time-domain. The 34 extracted electrophysiological features were calculated across different bipolar EEG channels and evaluated together with aggregated inter-channel measures, resulting in a total of 93 input attributes used for ML model development. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were analyzed using a distinct pipeline applied to wideband EEG data before low-pass filtering. Six machine learning algorithms-J48 Consolidated Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, k-nearest neighbor, and Support Vector Machine-were trained using 10 × 7 repeated cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), and F1-score.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 4.2 months, 13 patients (12.5%) developed epilepsy, and all diagnoses were made within 9 months. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.89) and specificity (0.95) but had low sensitivity (0.46). J48 achieved the highest sensitivity (0.87) and ROC AUC (0.79), with a specificity of 0.71. Incorporating clinical features, including recurrent seizures, increased sensitivity to 0.95. The most relevant predictors were patient history, frequency band power, particularly increased power in lower frequency bands, and high-frequency oscillations counts.
conclusionML-based analysis of initial EEG after a first febrile seizure may assist in early epilepsy risk stratification. J48 provided superior sensitivity, and combining electroencephalography-derived biomarkers with clinical data further enhanced predictive performance. Prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.