Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054254›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

"

Jessica Büchs, Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica BüchsClinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany, 49 2418038717.ORCID 0009-0007-9152-3542
Christiane Neuschaefer-RubePhoniatrics and Pedaudiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2207-0670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: We developed an e-learning tool in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) for medical students in Germany and tested it at Rhenish-Westphalian Technical University, Aachen. Our cross-sectional evaluation study is an innovative approach since the topic is yet to be implemented in medical education. Other AAC tools do not target medical students. Our study underlines the importance of AAC for medical doctors. Universities should include AAC in their lectures to prepare medical students for their clinical practice. The "AACHEN" tool is a first step.

Indexed as

Communication Devices for People with DisabilitiesComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansAACaugmentative and alternative communicationdigital learninge-learninge-learning toolmedical studentsphoniatricsteaching

Identifiers

PMID42054254
PMCPMC13127592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.