ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas2026
Brazilian science through the looking glass: a scientometric perspective from within and beyond.
Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citation analysis has emerged as a key area in scientometrics. However, the global movement toward open science, alongside the pervasive "publish or perish" culture, underscores the need to reevaluate the paradigm of citations as a measure of impact and quality. Brazil, a top 15 producer of scientific articles, has established the Lattes Platform, a comprehensive resource data on virtually active researchers in the country. Herein, the Brazilian scientific landscape was analyzed by integrating a widely used global ranking based on large-scale citation metrics with individual-level data from the Lattes Platform. The analysis assessed the impact, distribution, and disparities of Brazilian science across disciplines, geographic regions, and institutional affiliations from 2019-2023. Results showed that Brazilian researchers account for approximately 0.43% of the world's most cited scientists, a significant underrepresentation relative to Brazil's population share and scientific potential. Most highly cited scientists are concentrated in three states within the Southeast region, reflecting longstanding economic and infrastructural advantages. The majority of top Brazilian scientists work in Life Sciences, with particular representation in the subfields Zoology, Tropical Medicine, and Mycology & Parasitology. While Brazil's scientific output compares favorably with other South American and African countries, it remains behind nations with higher gross domestic products per capita and Human Development Index. Nonetheless, 73% of the most cited researchers receive national Research Productivity Grants, indicating a positive correlation between citation and qualified scientific excellence. These findings offer a deeper understanding of Brazilian scientific production from a citation perspective and advocate for strategic policy shifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.