Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054189›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2026

The vertebrate yolk sac: evolutionary origins and current advances in in vitro models.

Josephine R Blagrove, Ana E R Orsi, Tereza Cindrova-Davies, Kathy K Niakan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josephine R BlagroveLoke Centre for Trophoblast Research, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2765-3514
Ana E R OrsiLoke Centre for Trophoblast Research, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-1423
Tereza Cindrova-DaviesLoke Centre for Trophoblast Research, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9212-0514
Kathy K NiakanLoke Centre for Trophoblast Research, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-4734

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilChurchill College, University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge BB/X010899/1Wellcome 215116/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 221856/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key innovation in the evolutionary history of animals was the emergence of embryonic yolk, maternal nutrient deposits in the egg primarily composed of lipids and vitellogenin proteins. To contain and utilise yolk as a nutritional resource, many species have co-opted extra-embryonic tissue, named the extra-embryonic endoderm, to form a yolk sac. Extra-embryonic endoderm is believed to be conserved across vertebrate evolution, although its form and function have varied greatly over the past 500 million years. The yolk sac retains an essential role in nutrient transport, even in mammalian species that subsequently lost their yolk, and has also evolved additional functions in signalling and embryonic patterning. In this Review, we summarise our current understanding of vertebrate extra-embryonic endoderm evolution and diversity. We synthesise recent findings in reptiles to examine the evolution of the yolk sac and extra-embryonic endoderm in amniotes. Finally, we discuss how in vitro models can illuminate the function of this evolutionarily ancient extra-embryonic tissue, especially in the context of human development, in which yolk sac samples are extremely limited for investigation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalVertebratesYolk SacAnimalsEndodermHumansEmbryonic developmentEvolutionExtra-embryonic endodermStem cellsYolk sac

Identifiers

PMID42054189
PMCPMC13200725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.