ArticleCoDAS2026
Clinical investigation protocol for tinnitus (CIP-t): development and validation of an instrument.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was the development and validation of a clinical investigation protocol for tinnitus and the analysis of its applicability.
methodsThe research was conducted in eight stages: Stage 1: Literature review and development of the pilot protocol; Stage 2: Expert judges I - first analysis/evaluation; Stage 3: Elaboration of the unified investigation protocol and the application guide; Stage 4: Expert judges II - second analysis/evaluation of the instruments from the previous stage; Stage 5: Refinement of materials; Stage 6: Application of the protocol by expert and non-expert clinicians; Stage 7: Final construction; Stage 8: Pilot study - convenience sample. The results of each stage were compiled into an Excel spreadsheet for specific analyses (content validity ratio calculation and suggestions).
resultsThe structure of the protocol was successfully developed, resulting in a unified instrument subdivided into: tinnitus-focused anamnesis, audiological, emotional, metabolic, somatosensory, and vascular history, assessment results, a framework for subgroup classification, clinical decision tree, and complementary evaluations. The protocol was applied to a sample of 83 adults and older individuals.
conclusionThe clinical investigation protocol for tinnitus was finalized and its content validated, demonstrating applicability for adult and elderly individuals with tinnitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.