Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054182›Full record

ArticleCoDAS2026

Forming a choir with total laryngectomized patients.

Juliana Ceglio Monteiro, Sabrina Mazzer Paes, Renata Rangel Azevedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juliana Ceglio MonteiroDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-3872
Sabrina Mazzer PaesDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-4321
Renata Rangel AzevedoDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-5687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the experience of forming a choir with patients who have undergone total laryngectomy. The choir began its activities in 2019 and is composed of total laryngectomy patients who are currently undergoing or have previously undergone therapy at the service and, therefore, have heterogeneous esophageal voice (EV) production. Thus, patients are subdivided into four groups, according to their level of EV acquisition: Group 1 - fluent in oral communication with EV and users of electrolarynx (perform chorus and solos); Group 2 - produce words with EV (perform final sections of verses); Group 3 - patients who produce syllables and vowels with EV (mark the rhythm with sequential syllable emission); Group 4 - produce no sound with EV (perform body percussion effects). All actively participate in selecting the repertoire. The choir also includes laryngeal voices (university students and speech-language-hearing pathologists). Rehearsals take place weekly, as do the therapy sessions. Musical arrangements must be adapted so that all patients can effectively participate in the group's overall sound. This activity fosters greater interaction among participants, strengthening emotional bonds, providing socialization, and sharing experiences beyond rehabilitation. The musical repertoire is carefully selected, considering the length of the verses, the tempo of the songs, the sustain of notes, and the melodic line.

Indexed as

LaryngectomySpeech, EsophagealFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVoice Quality

Identifiers

PMID42054182
PMCPMC13143028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.