Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Use of D-dimer to Screen for Cerebral Pathology in ED Patients with Non-traumatic Headache and Normal Neurological Exam.
Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOur goal in this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of bedside D-dimer testing for identifying secondary headache due to intracranial pathology among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic headache and no neurological deficits.
methodsWe conducted this prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study across six tertiary care EDs in Türkiye. Adult patients presenting with non-traumatic headache and no neurological deficits who underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) based on clinical suspicion for intracranial pathology were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were recent trauma, pregnancy, fever, hematologic conditions, and known intracranial pathology. We measured bedside D-dimer using a D-dimer assay with a predefined threshold of 500 nanograms per milliliter. The primary outcome was secondary headache related to intracranial pathologies as determined on the index CT and additional tests as needed or during one-month follow-up.
resultsOf the 3,279 patients screened, 1,522 were included in the final analysis. Secondary headache due to intracranial pathology was identified in 57 patients (3.7%). The most common etiologies were subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 20, 35.1%), ischemic stroke (n = 16, 28.1%), cerebral vein thrombosis (n = 6, 10.5%), and subdural hemorrhage (n=6, 10.5%). Bedside D-dimer demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.5% (95% CI, 70-91%) and specificity of 89.2% (95% CI, 87-91%) for identifying intracranial pathology, with a positive likelihood ratio of 7.6 (95% CI, 6.3-9.2) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.35). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for cerebral venous thrombosis: sensitivity was 100% with a wide CI (95% CI, 54-100%), specificity was 86.8% (95% CI, 85-88%), and positive likelihood ratio was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.7-8.6). For subarachnoid hemorrhage, where sensitivity reached 90% (95% CI, 68-99%), specificity was 87.5% (95% CI, 86-89%), the positive likelihood ratio was 7.2 (95% CI: 5.9-8.8), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.1 (95% CI: 0.03-0.4).
conclusionBedside D-dimer testing showed moderate performance as a screening adjunct in ruling out secondary headache due to intracranial causes in ED patients with non-traumatic headache and no neurological findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.