ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Model Resuscitation Leadership Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents: Modified Delphi Study.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEffective resuscitation leadership is essential for emergency physicians, yet formal training in this domain remains limited within emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. Generic healthcare teamwork frameworks do not fully address the unique demands of EM resuscitations, including diagnostic uncertainty, time pressure, and frequent interruptions. Without consensus on the key competencies or instructional strategies needed to teach these EM-specific resuscitation leadership skills, residency programs lack clear curricular guidance. We aimed to achieve expert consensus on the learning objectives and educational strategies for a longitudinal model resuscitation leadership curriculum for EM residents using a modified Delphi approach.
methodsWe conducted a three-round modified Delphi study from September 2024-March 2025. Panelists were selected based on expertise in resuscitation leadership education and scholarship. We conducted a PubMed literature review that identified 19 references encompassing 244 skills and synthesized them into 31 initial learning objectives. By consensus, 12 educational strategies were identified. Panelists rated the importance of proposed learning objectives and educational strategies derived from a review of the literature and existing assessments. Additional items were added and refined across rounds based on panelist feedback. Consensus thresholds were predefined as > 75% agreement for inclusion (rated as important/very important or agree/strongly agree).
resultsTwelve experts participated in the study, representing diverse institutions and training backgrounds. By Round 3, consensus was achieved for 28 learning objectives and 13 educational strategies. Items were thematically categorized, and supplemental resources were developed to guide curricular implementation. The final curriculum integrates cognitive, procedural, and non-technical competencies contextualized within resuscitation environments and sequenced to support longitudinal skill development.
conclusionThis study presents the first expert consensus-derived resuscitation leadership curriculum for EM residents. The resulting framework provides EM residency programs with adaptable, evidence-informed guidance to support structured, longitudinal resuscitation leadership training and improved resuscitation team performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.