Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054133›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026

Cross-Sectional Examination of Hospital Visits in the Year Prior to Suicide Death in Illinois.

Maryann Mason, Yingxuan Liu, Krina Patel, Kunal Kanwar, Ursula Alexander, Alexander Lundberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryann MasonNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Yingxuan LiuNorthwestern University, Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Chicago, Illinois.
Krina PatelNova Southeastern University College of Allopathic Medicine, Davie, Florida.
Kunal KanwarNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Ursula AlexanderNorthwestern University, Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Chicago, Illinois.
Alexander LundbergNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuicide is a growing public health issue in the United States. Healthcare visits in the year prior to suicide death, including those to emergency departments (ED) and inpatient settings, may be missed opportunities for risk-screening and intervention delivery. Our objective in this study was to evaluate the distribution of hospital visits of suicide decedents in the year prior to death by setting (ED and inpatient), last visit proximity to death, and presence of suicide risk factors, and to consider each setting's potential for reaching those at risk of suicide.

methodsUsing linked data from the Illinois Hospital Discharge Data Set and the Illinois Violent Death Reporting System, we examined suicide decedent hospital visits 365 days prior to suicide death. We described the distribution of visits by setting (ED vs inpatient), timing of the last visit prior to death, and groupings of visit primary diagnosis codes, as per the International Classification of Diseases, 10

resultsOf the 2,562 suicide decedents, 960 (37.4%) had a visit in the year preceding their death. The 960 decedents had a total of 3,131 visits, an average of 3.3. per person. Of those visits, 2,002 (63.9%) were to the ED. However, there was a greater proportion of last visits to an inpatient unit (687, 60.9%) that occurred under 180 days of death compared to last ED visits (1,060, 52.1%), P < .05). Inpatient visits also had higher percentages of visits for each of the suicide risk-diagnosis code groups compared to ED visits; deliberate self-harm, 22.2% (n = 251) vs 6.8% (n = 136); suicidal ideation 29% (n = 327) vs 8.6% (n = 173); mental health disorders, 5.7% (n = 64) vs 3.1% (n = 62); and substance use disorder, 75.1% (n = 848) vs 35.3% (n = 706), P < .05. Among both inpatient and ED visits, substance use was the most prevalent of the primary diagnosis suicide risk-factor groups endorsed, although inpatient visits had a statistically significant higher proportion of primary diagnosis codes for substance use than ED visits, 75.1% (n = 848) and 35.3% (n = 706), respectively, all P < .05.

conclusionWe found the proportion of suicide decedents with a hospital visit in the year prior to death was lower than other studies found for primary care settings. However, this does not mean that broad-based suicide screening and interventions would not be of value in hospital settings.7,14 Inpatient visits were fewer in number but a greater proportion of visits in closer proximity to suicide death and with suicide risk factors. This suggests that EDs may be better suited to broad-based screening and inpatient settings to targeted intervention efforts. Inpatient visits involving primary diagnosis suicide-risk factors may offer more easily identifiable opportunities for suicide prevention compared to those in ED settings, based on prevalence and temporal and logistical factors. Future interventions could consider how to systemically integrate risk screenings in both settings, particularly for patients with a diagnosis of substance use disorder.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationSuicideAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansIllinoisMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID42054133
PMCPMC13016051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.