ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Feasibility of Implementing Evidence-based Practices for Suicidality Management in the Emergency Department.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBest practice recommendations and guidelines for the assessment and management of suicidality within the emergency department (ED) have recently been updated. Despite national efforts to improve the management of suicidality in the ED, evidence-based practices remain underused with varied uptake among EDs and clinical team members. Given that the ED is a common point of entry for many people with suicidality, implementation of evidence-based strategies are needed to increase access to these strategies and improve patient outcomes.
methodsTo generate insights about the feasibility of implementing evidence-based practices for suicidality management, we developed a semi-structured interview guide focused on factors expected to influence the implementation process using a novel application of the Organizational Readiness for Innovation Implementation Framework. Working from a list or 80 EDs in the state of Indiana, we recruited emergency physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and social workers to participate in interviews. Interviews lasted approximately 45-60 minutes and were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed using a multistage thematic analysis process.
resultsWe conducted 11 interviews with ED clinical team members from eight EDs in Indiana, representing 10% of the 80 EDs invited to participate in our study. Identified barriers to effective implementation included a general lack of resources, resistance to change among clinical team members, and competing demands in the ED setting. Facilitators included openness to attending training, openness to implementing change in the ED, and leadership support. Openness to change and commitment to change appeared to be driven by discontent with current processes and a desire to improve patient experiences.
conclusionConsidering mixed attitudes toward suicidality management and questions about whether these services are within the scope of clinicians who work in the ED, efforts to increase uptake of evidence-based practices may involve a multifaceted approach that involves identifying and training team members who are open and ready for change, while simultaneously establishing stronger relationships between ED clinical team members and behavioral health clinicians with specialized training who can provide consultative services in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.