ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Obligated To Say "Yes": The How and Why Behind Transfer Decisions in Moribund Patients.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA core principle of emergency care is the rapid transport of severely injured patients to hospitals capable of providing definitive care. Although the social, financial, and emotional factors associated with transfers, and their impact on hospital crowding, may necessitate a more nuanced approach, little has been published on how physicians actually make the decision to transfer a potentially moribund patient. We, therefore, sought to better understand these factors as the next step toward optimizing transfer flow and patient care.
methodsWe conducted one-hour, semi-structured interviews with 16 emergency physicians at referring and referral centers, including eight accepting physicians at a quaternary-care center and eight transferring physicians at community hospitals. Interviews focused on decision-making regarding interhospital transfers for moribund patients, defined as those with injuries or disease processes judged likely to be non-survivable. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify common themes and decision-making factors.
resultsWe identified four emerging themes that underpinned a decision to transfer or accept a potentially moribund trauma patient: 1) the accepting physician's perceived obligation to hospitals with fewer resources; 2) the difficulty of prognostication; 3) the imperfection and limitations of current advanced care planning documents; and 4) the impact of family and patient preferences.
conclusionThe rationale behind initiating and accepting transfers of moribund trauma patients is multifaceted. This study is the first to our knowledge that explores physician decision-making in this domain. Physicians feel an obligation to patients, families, and other hospitals, which leads to almost universally initiating or accepting transfers even in cases with limited hope of survival. These interviews offer insight into opportunities to improve statewide trauma operations and highlight avenues for promoting transfer-decision heuristics and pre-transfer goals-of-care conversations without compromising patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.