ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Impact of Emergency Department Intravenous-Fluid Conservation Strategies During a National Shortage: Multisite Retrospective Study.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective disaster response in healthcare depends on coordinated strategies that maintain access to critical supplies across institutions. During Hurricane Helene in September 2024, a major intravenous (IV) fluid shortage caused by the destruction of a manufacturing plant exposed the vulnerability of centralized supply chains. Our objective in this study was to evaluate the impact of a multisite IV fluid conservation initiative on ordering patterns, cost, and environmental outcomes across three emergency departments (ED).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study evaluating large-volume, IV fluid-bolus orders placed before, during, and after the critical shortage. Interventions included an interruptive alert in the electronic health record, clinician education, and workflow adjustments. Our primary outcome measure was the number of IV fluid-bolus orders placed during each period. Secondary outcomes included total fluid volume administered, total cost of fluids, estimated carbon dioxide emissions, and the proportion of ED encounters involving fluid administration.
resultsDuring the pre-shortage period, 24,251 IV fluid-bolus orders were placed across 41,752 ED encounters (41.8%). Orders dropped to 18,692 during the critical shortage across 39,840 encounters (30.8%), reflecting a 22.9% relative reduction. In the post-shortage period, 23,911 orders were placed across 40,967 encounters (39.6%), remaining slightly below baseline. Estimated cost savings during the shortage period totaled $27,202, with a projected annual savings of $108,808. Carbon dioxide emissions dropped by 3.1 metric tons-the equivalent of avoiding the use of over 349 gallons of gasoline.
conclusionEmergency department-based conservation strategies were associated with measurable reductions in IV fluid use, cost, and environmental impact. Further validation is needed to understand their impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare system resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.