ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Decoding Emergency Department Dissatisfaction: Factors Associated with Patient Complaints.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient experience has important implications for hospitals and patient care including its ties to reputation, reimbursement, and clinical outcomes. Despite its importance, little is known about how operational factors in the emergency department (ED) impact formal complaints. In this study we aimed to identify encounter-level operational characteristics associated with the risk of formal patient complaints.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective matched-cohort study of ED encounters between October 2023-December 2024 at three EDs affiliated with a large academic health system. Each complaint case was matched to three non-complaint cases (3:1 matching) based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, acuity score, and chief complaint. We used logistic regression to assess the associations between operational factors and the likelihood of submitting a formal complaint. A Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons with statistical significance set at P < .005.
resultsOf 246,983 ED visits, 476 (0.19%) formal complaints were submitted. These were matched with 1,428 non-complaint cases. Baseline characteristics, which included age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary insurance, and chief complaint, did not differ, by design, between groups. Analysis revealed that ED length of stay ≥ 12 hours (odds ratio OR 3.12; 95% CI, 2.34-4.18) and an average of more than one ED visit per month (2.00; 1.45-2.73) were significantly associated with increased odds of filing a complaint. In contrast, any imaging performed during the visit (0.43; 0.35-0.54), hospital admission (0.72; 0.57-0.90), and presenting to the ED during a high-volume time (0.47; 0.33-0.67) were significantly associated with decreased odds of filing a complaint.
conclusionLength of stay > 12 hours and frequent ED visits were associated with a significantly increased complaint risk. Any form of diagnostic imaging, admission to the hospital, and presenting to the ED during a high-volume period were associated with fewer complaints. These findings offer ED and hospital leadership insights on the patient experience and highlight that improving capacity constraints for all patients can have downstream benefits for those who submit formal complaints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.