ArticleJAMA network open2026
Immunomodulators, Biologics, and 5-ASA for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Older Adults.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), driven by chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and use of certain therapeutic regimens. Whether different IBD treatments mitigate this risk remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association of the use of immunomodulators or biologics vs 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) with risk of MACE among older patients with IBD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study was conducted among a 15% Medicare claims sample of patients with IBD aged 65 years or older was identified, with entry defined by the first prescription of immunomodulators, biologics, or 5-ASA between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020. Follow-up extended to the outcome, switch or discontinuation of study drug, the study's administrative end, or up to 3 years, whichever occurred first. Propensity score matching at a 1:3 ratio balanced demographics, comorbidities, and medication use between groups. Data analyses were conducted between January and September 2025. Exposures: Exposures were use of immunomodulators or biologics compared with 5-ASA, identified using National Drug Codes and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System procedure codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to the first emergency department or inpatient visit caused by a MACE, defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for MACE risk with immunomodulators or biologics vs 5-ASA were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 16 387 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.73 [6.79] years; 9861 [60.18%] female) were included in the analysis. In the immunomodulators vs 5-ASA and biologics vs 5-ASA cohort, the mean (SD) ages were 74.05 (6.43) years and 73.68 (6.01) years, respectively, after matching. Both cohorts had more female participants (2580 [58.85%] and 1780 [58.09%], respectively). Baseline comorbidities were mostly balanced between groups. Compared with 5-ASA, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of MACE for immunomodulators (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.61-1.17]) or biologics (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.59-1.24]), although point estimates were below 1. Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of Medicare beneficiaries with IBD, there was no statistically significant difference in MACE risk between those who used immunomodulators or biologics vs 5-ASA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.