Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054021›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Electrophoresis-By-Accident in Electrospray Ion Source.

Chikondi Shaba, Pawel L Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chikondi ShabaDepartment of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.
Pawel L UrbanDepartment of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3471-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preparing samples for analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) can be laborious and challenging. Hyphenated separation tools are convenient but costly and require much attention. Here, we present a facile low-cost online MS method for analysis of complex samples. It relies on a standard unmodified electrospray ionization (ESI) source, which incorporates polyether ether ketone tubing connected to a grounded metal union or diverter valve. The sample is infused by a syringe pump, and the flow is stopped. During the stopped-flow stage, ionic species are spontaneously separated due to the electric field between the ESI capillary and the grounded element. The flow is then restarted, and the separated species pass to the ion source. The signals of analytes are enhanced with respect to the signals obtained during direct infusion. This enhancement is attributed to the microseparation of analyte and matrix ions occurring in the sample flow line section. The signal change factors ranged from 0.74 to 295. The reported intrinsic property of ESI─operated in a run-stop-run sequence─has broad applicability in analysis of metabolites, peptides, and proteins in complex matrices. Given the tens of thousands of ESI-MS systems used worldwide, this fundamental finding could have broad applicability.

Identifiers

PMID42054021
PMCPMC13177287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.