Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054008›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontology2026

Deep learning cone-beam computed tomography image segmentation for the 3D visualization of mandibular infraosseous periodontal defects.

Daniel Palkovics, Balint Molnar, Csaba Pinter, David García-Mato, Andres Diaz-Pinto, Attila Tanacs, Andrea Dobos, Peter Windisch, Christoph A Ramseier

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel PalkovicsDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Balint MolnarDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba PinterDent.AI Medical Imaging Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
David García-MatoDent.AI Medical Imaging Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Andres Diaz-PintoSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Campus, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Attila TanacsDent.AI Medical Imaging Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea DobosDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter WindischDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Christoph A RamseierDepartment of Periodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate assessment of infraosseous periodontal defects is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables detailed imaging of these defects; however, to leverage their full potential, CBCT images must be reconstructed in 3 dimensions (3D). Manual and semi-automatic (SA) segmentation methods are time-consuming and prone to human error. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in segmenting mandibular infraosseous periodontal defects on CBCT scans.

methodsA multi-stage Segmentation Residual Network (SegResNet)-based DL model was used to segment CBCT scans from patients with stages III to IV periodontitis. Linear and volumetric measurements of infraosseous defects from DL-generated 3D models were compared to those obtained using SA segmentation. The depth (INFRA), width (WIDTH), angle (ANGLE), and volume of 48 infraosseous defects were assessed on both DL and SA segmentations.

resultsMeasurements made on the DL and SA segmentations correlated strongly. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.941 (p < 0.0001) for INFRA, 0.943 (p < 0.0001) for WIDTH, 0.889 (p < 0.0001) for ANGLE, and 0.948 (p < 0.0001) for defect volume. These results indicate high reliability of the DL model in capturing key characteristics of infraosseous periodontal defects.

conclusionsThese findings support the use of DL-based CBCT segmentation as a valuable tool for enhancing periodontal diagnosis. However, as this study was limited to mandibular defects, applicability to maxillary cases remains to be validated.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossCone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalMandibular DiseasesPeriodontitisAdultFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMandibleMiddle Aged3D visualizationartificial intelligencecone‐beam computed tomographydeep learninginfraosseous defectsperiodontal defectssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID42054008
PMCPMC13568841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.