ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Diagnostic Investigation of Two Cases of Oslerus osleri Infection in Dogs: Microscopic Challenges and Molecular Characterisation.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of certain lungworm infections in dogs relies heavily on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytology or lesion histopathology, especially in situations in which faecal diagnostics and bloodwork may have limited value. Differentiating morphologically similar parasitic larvae on BAL cytology, such as Oslerus osleri or Filaroides hirthi, may be challenging, and molecular approaches are not yet widely available.
objectiveDescription of two cases of O. osleri infection in young dogs, including (1) representative examples of BAL cytology and lesion-specific histopathologic findings and (2) molecular characterisation, based on targeted gene amplification and sequencing, from cytologic and histopathologic samples of O. osleri.
methodsTwo cases of O. osleri infection were investigated and followed in detail. BAL slides and tracheobronchial biopsy samples were analysed: six primer pairs spanning the ribosomal RNA gene of O. osleri were used to amplify the specific regions of genomic DNA from stained BAL slides (Case 1) and from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tracheobronchial biopsy (Case 2). Amplicon sequences were compared to O. osleri nucleotide sequences available in GenBank.
resultsThe amplicon sequences obtained from both cases were 100% identical, indicating that the infections in both dogs were caused by the same organism. BLAST analysis against the GenBank nucleotide database showed a 100% match with O. osleri, thereby confirming the diagnosis.
conclusionsPCR testing for O. osleri is feasible on genomic DNA obtained from stained BAL smears and sections of FFPE tissue. Further testing of these primers on other lungworms, such as F. hirthi, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.