ArticleReproduction & fertility2026
Beyond euploidy: the synergistic value of blastocyst morphology in predicting ongoing implantation in advanced maternal age women.
Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing the Endometrial Factor in Recurrent Implantation Failure: From Established Diagnostics to Mechanism-Informed Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: This single-centre retrospective study evaluated whether blastocyst morphology remains an independent predictor of euploidy and implantation rates in an advanced maternal age (AMA) population after controlling for chromosomal status. Analysing 1,067 biopsied blastocysts from 308 IVF cycles (269 patients) between October 2021 and December 2022, embryos were graded via the Gardner and Schoolcraft system and categorised into Excellent, Good, Average, and Poor groups. The overall euploidy rate was 33.62%, with blastocysts of the Excellent group exhibiting a significantly higher euploidy rate compared to the Good, Average, and Poor groups (65.38 vs 54.74, 31.46, and 18.79%, respectively; P < 0.001). Logistic regression confirmed that Excellent/Good (odds ratio (OR): 5.60; 95% CI: 4.07-7.71) and Average (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.40-2.81) embryos were significantly more likely to be euploid than Poor embryos. Among confirmed euploid transfers, morphological grade significantly impacted clinical outcomes: Excellent/Good grades yielded an implantation rate of 52.38%, whereas Poor grades yielded only 23.81% (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis verified that morphological grade is a significant prognostic factor for implantation, independent of ploidy status. In conclusion, euploidy does not equalise implantation potential across all morphological grades in older women. Thus, blastocyst morphology serves as a critical secondary selection tool, suggesting that Poor-grade euploid embryos may harbour non-chromosomal compromises that affect developmental competence. Lay summary: When patients undergo IVF, they often use genetic testing (PGT-A) to select embryos with the correct number of chromosomes, known as 'euploid' embryos. While it is often suggested that genetic normalcy is the most critical factor for success, the importance of an embryo's physical appearance (morphology) in these cases remains a subject of debate. Our study investigated this in women aged 35 or older by analysing over 1,000 embryos and found that, even among those with normal genetics, morphology still plays a vital role. Specifically, genetically normal embryos with poor physical appearances had significantly lower chances of successful implantation compared to high-quality ones. We discovered that the quality of the 'inner cell mass', the part that becomes the baby, is a particularly strong predictor of success. These findings suggest that, for older patients, choosing an embryo based on both genetics and appearance is essential for the best pregnancy outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.