ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The future of lung cancer surgery lies between innovations: synergy across the perioperative ERATS pathway.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compare patients’ postoperative pain on the day of surgery and their analgesic use at their 2-week follow-up visit who underwent SP subcostal versus MP intercostal robotic pulmonary resection. A total of 2,613 robotic thoracic lung resections performed between July 2016 and October 2025 were screened. A retrospective, propensity-matched cohort of 164 patients (41 SP, 123 MP) was analyzed and matched 1:3 by age, gender, ASA class, BMI, and ethnicity. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (0–10) during the first 18 h. Analgesic consumption was assessed at the 2-week follow-up visit. From December 2022 to October 2025, 41 patients underwent SP robotic pulmonary resection and were propensity-matched to 123 MP patients. Lymph node yield was comparable for lobectomy (SP 29 ± 10 vs. MP 32 ± 11; p = .24) and sublobar resection (SP 24 ± 13 vs. MP 25 ± 10; p = .71). Operative time was longer in SP lobectomy (152.6 ± 34.4 vs. 128.7 ± 45.0 min; p = .01). Postoperative pain scores were lower in the SP group at all assessed intervals: 1–3, 3–10, and 10–18 h (p < .05). At the 2-week follow-up visit, patients in the SP group had lower analgesic use (p≤ .042). Single-port robotic pulmonary resection may be associated with lower early postoperative pain and reduced analgesic consumption at 2 weeks compared with multiport robotic resection. Prospective, multi-institutional studies are required to evaluate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.