ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Étude de faisabilité du dispositif « Passerelle » couplant transfert monétaire non fléché et orientation sociale destiné à des ménages en situation de précarité en France.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
interventionThe new "Passerelle" program aims to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in diet in France, by offering an untargeted cash transfer (CT) coupled with social guidance to households in precarious situations.
objectivesAssess the feasibility of the program and data collection for monitoring indicators, to inform the design of a future trial to evaluate its effectiveness.
methodsSingle-group pre-post-test feasibility study. The program was implemented in Montreuil (France) with households in precarious situations identified by local social actors. The feasibility of the program was assessed in terms of implementation of household targeting (number and socio-economic characteristics of participants), intervention components (participation rates), and user acceptability (questionnaire and qualitative survey). The feasibility of data collection was assessed by participation in surveys before inclusion (t0) and after 3 (t1) and 6 months (t2), response rates and responsiveness of food security and well-being indicators.
resultsTwo hundred households took part in the program, 90% were in monetary poverty, 82% in food insufficiency, 97% received the cash transfer card, 99% attended the social orientation meeting, over 95% said they were satisfied with the program, and 69% said they improved their food purchases. The qualitative survey documented the reasons for acceptability. Participation rates at t0, t1 and t2 were 93%, 76% and 73%. Non-response rates were below 5% for most indicators. Follow-up indicators ranged from + 19% to + 99% at t1.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of the program and collecting data from the target population to monitor food security and well-being indicators. It confirms the interest of a future trial to evaluate the program effectiveness, in order to contribute to reflections on policies to combat food insecurity in France. An analysis of the program theory, explaining the expected changes, mechanisms and conditions of impact would be beneficial for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.