Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053920›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Cancer screening learning for adults with intellectual disability.

Daniel Satgé, Elodie Neumann-Michel, Amaëlle Otandault, Anaïs Lecluse, Elisangela Olivier, Marc Palpacuer, Xavier Heber-Suffrin, Brigitte Trétarre, Chris Serrand, Geneviève Petitpierre

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel Satgé, ONCODEFI Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France. daniel.satge@oncodefi.org.
Elodie Neumann-Michel, ONCODEFI Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France.
Amaëlle Otandault, ONCODEFI Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France.
Anaïs LecluseÉtablissement et Service d'Aide par le Travail L'Envol, UNAPEI 34, Castelnau-Le-Lez, France.
Elisangela Olivier, ONCODEFI Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France.
Marc Palpacuer, ONCODEFI Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France.
Xavier Heber-SuffrinÉtablissement et Service d'Aide par le Travail L'Envol, UNAPEI 34, Castelnau-Le-Lez, France.
Brigitte TrétarreHerault Tumor Registry, Montpellier, France.
Chris SerrandDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, UMR UA11, INSERM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Geneviève PetitpierreDepartment of Special Education, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

CPAM No numberINCa #2021-156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCompared to the general population, persons with intellectual disability (ID) have a similar cancer rate, but cancer is often discovered at a later stage. Adults with ID show lower participation in organized screenings for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Here we tested an intervention to increase cancer screening knowledge and intention to participate among persons with ID.

methodsAn open-label cluster randomized controlled trial was co-constructed with people having ID. Participants with ID underwent interventions about cancer screening or oral hygiene, using PowerPoint presentations, booklets, dice games, workshops, films, and discussions. Both groups completed a questionnaire two weeks before the intervention and at 15 min, three months, and one year after the intervention, which evaluated their knowledge gain and intention to participate in cancer screenings.

resultsAt 15 min, three months, and one year after the intervention, participants in the cancer group showed significantly improved cancer screening knowledge (p < 0.001). The intention to participate in screenings was increased on the intervention date (p < 0.001), but this change was non-significant three months later, and observed as a trend at one year (p = 0.068). A steering group of persons with ID gave advice regarding participant recruitment, conducting sessions, and modifying the film scenario, PowerPoint presentation, and questionnaire. Persons with ID co-constructed the booklet on cancer screening and acted in the film.

conclusionParticipation of persons with ID greatly improved the study efficacy. This research provides strong evidence supporting direct interventions for people with intellectual disability to increase their participation in organized cancer screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntellectual DisabilityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAccessible informationCancer screeningIntellectual disabilityInterventional studyLearning

Identifiers

PMID42053920
PMCPMC13129136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.