ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Évaluation de la formation au recueil de données par entretiens semi-directifs destinée aux patientes-chercheuses du groupe de recherche IMPAQT : une étude de cas sur le rôle du partage d'expériences et du soutien social pour soutenir l'apprentissage.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsIn 2023, training in individual research interviewing was developed and implemented by social psychology researchers to enable patient researchers from the IMPAQT research group to participate in the data collection for the Ancolies project. The training was aimed at intra-individual changes (increased knowledge, sense of efficacy, and development of skills) based on interpersonal processes (sharing of experience, social support) which were part of a positive group dynamic pre-existing the training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the training.
methodsTo meet the research objectives, several tools were developed : (1) an observation grid; (2) a voice recording of the second training module; and (3) a short questionnaire completed at the end of the training day.
resultsThe three patient researchers who participated in the training reported that they felt capable of conducting interviews during the Ancolies project. Several learning dynamics related to the participants' experience were highlighted : Sharing research experiences provided informational support that facilitated knowledge acquisition, while sharing illness experiences enhanced the credibility of role-playing exercises and strengthened the patient researchers' skills in conducting interviews. A single day of training, however, proved insufficient for all the participants.
conclusionThe training appears to promote the commitment and skill development of patient researchers, despite being limited to a single-day format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.