ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Expériences et perceptions de la mise à l'échelle d'une intervention de santé publique: entretiens auprès d'une variété d'acteurs français.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionScaling up public health interventions is a major avenue for evidence-based public health policy. Many attempts have been made, but there have also been major difficulties and many failures. Scaling up is not easy; it is neither obvious nor spontaneous.
objectivesThis study sets out to clarify the concept itself, distinguish the strategies on which it is based, describe the process, and identify the factors that affect it.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 scale-up experimenters from a variety of backgrounds. The interviews focused on 19 public health interventions.
resultsScaling up is an active, progressive, and multidimensional process. It is based on a variety of strategies relating to territorial expansion, sustainability, and adaptation to the realities of the intervention. Four types of favourable decision could be identified: funding, support, commitment, and adoption; they emanate from multiple decision-makers. Eight essential activities emerged. In addition, scaling is based on organisations that adopt different conformations and different methods of identifying multipliers. Finally, six catalysts and six inhibitors were identified.
conclusionThis study has made it possible to stabilise the concept of scaling up and deepen our understanding of the process. New opportunities are emerging to support the players and decision-makers involved in scaling up public health interventions. Similarly, new research perspectives are emerging, in particular through the mobilisation of the political sociology of public action, and management and marketing sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.