ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Evaluation of DNA methylation-based age prediction accuracy in leukemia patients using a six-CpG model trained on healthy blood.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation-based age estimation is a promising tool in forensic and biomedical research. However, its accuracy in diseased populations, particularly hematologic malignancies, remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated epigenetic age predictions from whole blood samples of 47 leukemia patients using an 8-CpG methylation panel. DNA methylation levels were analyzed using the SNaPshot method, and the predicted age was calculated using a six-CpG regression model previously trained on healthy whole blood and applied unchanged to leukemia samples. Predicted ages were compared with chronological age to assess prediction accuracy across leukemia subtypes and age groups. Compared to the reference model, leukemia samples showed weakened CpG-specific correlations with age. Subtype-specific deviations were notable, particularly at loci such as ASPA and TOM1L1, which diverged from established age-methylation trends. Consequently, predicted ages often differed substantially from chronological ages. For the general leukemia cohort, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 9.74 years (95% CI: 7.14–12.29; IQR: 7.3 years), and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was 13.11 years. Among subtypes, AML patients showed the highest error (MAE = 14.25 years), while CLL patients had the lowest (MAE = 8.72 years). These findings underscore the impact of leukemia-associated epigenetic alterations on age prediction accuracy and highlight the need for disease-specific adjustments to improve the reliability of DNA methylation-based age estimation in clinical and forensic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.