ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
ONC-Call: A Hands-On Workshop of Emergent Spine Radiation Therapy for Multidisciplinary Trainees.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structured opportunities for interprofessional education remain limited in radiation oncology training programs, particularly related to emergency scenarios. To address this gap, we developed a workshop entitled "ONC-Call: A Team-Based Response to Spinal Cord Compression" at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The three-hour workshop took place on July 18, 2025, and involved 53 participants, including 10 radiation oncology residents, 7 medical physics residents, 21 radiation therapy students, and 15 medical dosimetry students. Participants rotated through five interactive stations—patient evaluation, patient simulation, treatment planning, physics quality assurance, and treatment delivery—each led by an instructor from the corresponding discipline. The patient simulation and treatment delivery stations took place at a CT simulator and treatment machine, respectively, which were engaged with mannequins to facilitate hands-on education. Participants completed Likert-scale questionnaires before and after the workshop, including an Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS) for all participants and a clinical confidence survey for the radiation oncology residents. Response rates were 79% and 75% for the pre- and post-workshop IPAS questionnaires, respectively, and 100% and 80% for the pre- and post-workshop radiation oncology resident-specific surveys, respectively. The baseline IPAS questionnaire responses reflected strongly favorable attitudes across all healthcare domains without any significant differences between pre- and post-workshop responses. However, radiation oncology residents demonstrated significant improvements in 13 out of 14 clinical confidence items following the workshop. This reproducible session may be adapted by other institutions to enhance interprofessional preparedness in radiation oncology emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.