Trial reportWorld journal of urology2026
Thulium fiber laser versus Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: 24-month outcomes from a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus conventional holmium:YAG laser in anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Transient and persistent urinary incontinence after thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP): long-term trends and predictive factors in a real-world cohort.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare 24-month outcomes of Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).
methodsA 24-month follow-up analysis of a prospective randomized trial including 150 patients (ThuFLEP n = 74, HoLEP n = 76) was conducted. Primary outcome was non-inferior International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) reduction. Secondary outcomes included urinary continence, medication use reduction, erectile and ejaculatory function, and late adverse events.
resultsAt 24 months, non-inferiority of ThuFLEP regarding IPSS and QoL was confirmed (p = 0.03). Median IPSS improved from 21 preoperatively to 3 after ThuFLEP and from 20 to 4 after HoLEP (p < 0.001), with no significant intergroup differences at any time point (all p > 0.1). Median QoL improved from 4 to 1 in both groups (p < 0.001), likewise without significant differences at any time point (all p > 0.3). Continence rates improved from 74.0% preoperatively to 90.0%, pad usage decreased from 89.8% to 25.4% and ICIQ-SF decreased from 5 to 3 points (all p < 0.001), without intergroup differences (all p > 0.1). Use of medication for lower urinary tract symptoms decreased from 89.4% to 7.7% (p < 0.001). Ejaculatory function declined, while ejaculation-related bother remained unchanged and erectile function improved modestly, all without intergroup differences (all p > 0.1). Three late adverse events occurred exclusively in the ThuFLEP group, without statistical significance (p > 0.1).
conclusionThuFLEP remains non-inferior to HoLEP for patient-reported functional outcomes at 24 months and demonstrates comparable safety, continence, medication use reduction, and sexual function results over time. Both techniques represent effective, durable and safe surgical options for treating benign prostatic obstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032699 (18.09.2023, retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.