Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053835›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2026

Are Full-Night Samplings Necessary? Unraveling the Hourly Structure and Climatic Responses of Three Moth Groups in a Brazilian Pampa Grassland.

Matheus Eduardo Schwantes, Isabela Andrade Bahima, Viviane Gianluppi Ferro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matheus Eduardo SchwantesPrograma de Pós Graduação Em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências, Univ Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. schwantes.me@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-9618
Isabela Andrade BahimaCurso de Ciências Biológicas, Instituto de Biociências, Univ Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7941-0417
Viviane Gianluppi FerroDepto de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Univ Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-806X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Código de Financiamento 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The daily activity of a species can be affected by several biotic and abiotic factors. Since the activity patterns and flight times of Neotropical moths are both poorly understood, our goal was to record and analyze the flight times of moths from the Pampa biome, in the extreme south of Brazil, as well as its responses to climatic factors. We recorded hours of activity and investigated the influence of four climatic variables on the activity patterns of Arctiinae (Erebidae), Sphingidae, and Saturniidae. Data analysis showed that different species have different activity periods, and the abundance and richness of each taxon has its own patterns. Arctiinae had a higher abundance in the early evening, although it did not show a richness concentration at any hour. Saturniidae and Sphingidae had both abundance and richness concentrated in the middle of the night. Climatic variables related to abundance and richness differed between taxa and species. We provide evidence of possible niche partitioning and differential physiological adaptations between taxa, as well as differences in flight time strategy between potential competing species. Our study highlights the necessity of full-night sampling for optimal faunal inventories.

Indexed as

ClimateFlight, AnimalMothsAnimalsBrazilGrasslandArctiinaeNatural historyNeotropical LepidopteraSaturniidaeSphingidae

Identifiers

PMID42053835
PMCPMC13128753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.