ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Development and validation of a predictive model for acute respiratory distress syndrome in moderate-to-late preterm infants: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm infants are at high risk for neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to physiological immaturity and multiple factors. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for this population. This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data from preterm infants aged 28 ~ 37 weeks who required mechanical ventilation (MV) within 7 days after birth. These infants were admitted to 2 hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU). Clinical data, including blood parameters and arterial blood gas indicators, were collected. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors to develop a nomogram model. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with external validation. The results indicated that maternal education level, gestational age, birth weight, SIRI, and arterial PaCO₂ within 1 h after admission were independent predictors for ARDS diagnosis in preterm infants. Integrating these variables into the prediction model yielded an AUC of 0.890 in the training set and 0.845 in the validation set, with a specificity of 0.816. Within the predicted probability range of 0.05-0.95, the model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with any individual predictor alone.
conclusionBased on prenatal risk factors and early postnatal blood gas and biochemical indicators, this study developed a novel risk prediction model for ARDS in moderate-to-late preterm infants. It provides a reference for early identification and precise intervention of ARDS in this population. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Existing predictive models for ARDS are largely based on term or late-preterm infants. Preterm infants at 28 ~ 37 weeks of gestation, however, present a diagnostic challenge owing to lung immaturity and often atypical symptoms. There are currently no validated tools for specifically assessing ARDS risk in this population. WHAT IS NEW: • We developed an interpretable nomogram incorporating preterm gestational age, birth weight, SIRI, arterial PaCO₂, and maternal education level to provide individualized ARDS risk assessment for moderate-to-late preterm infants. By visualizing each predictor's contribution at the bedside, it offers clinical transparency and a unique advantage over prior generalized models, filling a critical gap in tools for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.