ArticleLifetime data analysis2026
Instrumental variable estimation of a hazard ratio for treatment with a waiting time without specifying its dependence on unmeasured confounders: application to a procedural registry.
Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timing of an intervention such as surgery may happen sometime after treatment inception (e.g., diagnosis date) due to being put on a wait-list for treatment or being scheduled for treatment at a later time. If interest lies in the change in risk upon receiving the intervention, a Cox model with a time-dependent exposure may be employed. However, if there exists unmeasured confounding, maximum partial likelihood estimators of the hazard ratio are biased. An instrumental variable is a cause of the exposure of interest but not of the outcome except through the exposure. We propose a new framework involving potential outcomes for each possible waiting time, and derive an estimating equation for the hazard ratio of a treatment with a time-dependent start using an instrumental variable without making any assumptions about the form of involvement of unmeasured confounders. We conducted simulations to evaluate bias of our hazard ratio estimator. We illustrate the approach using two examples: First, we analyzed a procedural registry for which instrumental variable based estimators may be the only unbiased approach. Second, we demonstrate causal hazard ratio estimation for a randomized trial with time-dependent treatment initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.