ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2026
Pharmacokinetics of venetoclax in a patient after whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of Whipple Pancreaticoduodenectomy, which involves the resection of the duodenum and partial stomach, on the pharmacokinetic (PK) of venetoclax, is unknown. This case reported the PK parameters of venetoclax in a patient with synchronous acute myeloid leukemia and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, who underwent a Whipple procedure, and was treated with a single dose of venetoclax 400 mg. Due to the limited sampling available, the PK parameters of venetoclax in this patient could not be determined by noncompartmental analysis. We leveraged the existing population pharmacokinetic (POP-PK) model to predict this patient’s concentration–time profile and PK parameters from sparse observed data post hoc. The model-predicted concentration resulted in adequate reconstruction of the patient’s concentration-time profile. Our patient Cmax was approximately 234 µg/L, 5-fold below the Cmax of 1050 µg/L-1077 µg/L as reported for the general population. Despite the expected decrease in systemic exposure due to the Whipple, our patient AUC0-∞ was 20.4 mg*h/L (modeled out to infinity) or 15.4 mg*h/L (absorption truncated at 48 hour), approximately 2-fold below the mean AUC values reported in the literature of 32.8 (±16.9), and 24.3 (1.5 geoSD) mg*h/L, yet well within the population range of values. Overall, Whipple leads to a significant change in the PK characteristics of venetoclax. Change in dosing strategy in patients with a similar clinical profile in order to achieve venetoclax concentrations comparable to the reference population at a single dose of 400 mg is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.