Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053729›Full record

ArticleIndian pediatrics2026

Efficacy of 800 IU Versus 400 IU Daily Oral Vitamin D

Sudarshan Jayasimha, Bhawna Dubey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sudarshan JayasimhaDepartment of Neonatology, ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India. sudarshanj.5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0195-5932
Bhawna DubeyDepartment of Neonatology, ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of daily supplementation of 800 IU versus 400 IU vitamin D

methodsAn open-label randomized controlled trial including exclusively breastfed term SGA infants was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Eligible infants were randomized within 24 h of life to receive either 800 IU or 400 IU daily oral vitamin D

resultsAmong 60 enrolled infants, the distribution of baseline variables was similar in both groups. The proportion of infants with VDI at 14 weeks was significantly less in 800 IU (30%) versus 400 IU (63.3%) group (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.18, 0.73; P = 0.016). In the 800 IU group, there was a trend towards reduction in the proportion of infants with VDD, and no infant with severe VDD. Clinical rickets was seen in 3 infants (1 in 800 IU and 2 in 400 IU), with all having VDD. None of the infants had VDT.

conclusionDaily oral supplementation of 800 IU vitamin D

Indexed as

BreastfeedingComplianceHypovitaminosis DSmall for gestational age (SGA)SupplementToxicityVitamin D deficiency

Identifiers

PMID42053729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.