ArticleTranslational stroke research2026
Associations Between Early Functional Brain Network Topology and 6-Month Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Stroke Patients.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate early functional correlates of different upper limb motor outcomes 6 months post-stroke. This case-control study enrolled 57 stroke patients and 15 controls who underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans between 2022 and 2024. Hemiplegic upper limb motor function was repeatedly evaluated using Fugl-Meyer assessment–upper extremity (FMA-UE) within 6 months post-stroke. Motor outcome was classified into bad, moderate or good based on the final scores. Resting-state functional network topology was compared and correlated with motor outcomes. The good outcome group demonstrated better initial upper limb function and faster recovery. The moderate outcome group showed comparable initial performance to the bad outcome group but faster recovery. All groups exhibited small-world characteristics; however, both the good outcome group and healthy controls exhibited higher global/local network efficiency. The bad outcome group lacked interhemispheric connections compared to moderate outcomes and showed fewer ipsilesional / interhemispheric connections versus good outcomes. The good outcome group demonstrated stronger limbic functional connectivity than moderate outcomes. The above connections were positively correlated with upper limb motor function. While interhemispheric connectivity is associated with motor recovery, favorable outcomes are also linked to additional restoration of ipsilesional intrahemispheric connections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.