Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053639›Full record

ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026

Psychometric properties of suicide risk assessments in young Black populations internationally: a scoping review.

David James Grant, Raquel Watkis, Mark A Ferro, John P Hirdes, Christopher M Perlman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David James GrantSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. dj2grant@uwaterloo.ca.
Raquel WatkisSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Mark A FerroSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
John P HirdesSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Christopher M PerlmanSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSuicide rates amongst Black young people are increasing and emerging as leading causes of death for various Black subgroups worldwide. Few studies exist examining the reliability and validity of current suicide risk instruments for assessing suicide risk amongst this vulnerable, diverse population internationally. This scoping review examined the psychometric properties of suicide risk assessments among young Black populations globally.

methodsWe utilized Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework and the PRISMA guidelines for reporting our results. Our inclusion criteria included psychometric studies with samples involving Black participants ages 10–34 years old.

resultsWe identified 20 studies summarizing eight suicide scales and five mental health scales with embedded suicide risk scales. The Ask Suicide Screening Questionnaire was the most utilized scale amongst Black young people; most suicide psychometric studies were conducted in the USA followed by countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (Nigeria, Uganda and Ghana). ASQ Sensitivity ranged from 67 to 94% and 43–91% specificity.

conclusionOur study reveals that thirteen suicide risk scales have been psychometrically tested with Black young people worldwide, with ASQ being the most commonly tested. The ASQ may serve as a feasible low-burden option in hospital settings to assist with universal screening for Black young people but should be evaluated in other Black young populations in the USA and outside of the USA to confirm cross-cultural validity.

Indexed as

African DiasporaBlackGlobalPsychometricSuicide RiskSuicide risk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.