ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Radiomics-based outcome prediction for irinotecan-TACE in colorectal liver metastases: advanced analysis from the prospective CIREL trial.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a promising locoregional therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases, but patient selection remains challenging. We aimed to develop and validate prognostic radiomics-based machine learning models in a multicenter, prospectively collected drug-eluting microsphere TACE cohort. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 76 patients (176 lesions) from the prospective CIREL registry trial. Radiomic features were extracted from each lesion. We tested three types of imaging markers: general radiomics, intensity-based features, and lesion volume. For each, we derived baseline and delta features, reflecting the difference in feature vector values between baseline and first follow-up. Using a center-based split, we trained genetic/evolutionary machine learning models to predict survival and lesion-level response.
resultsThe median age of the final study population with baseline imaging was 66 years (IQR, 59-71), with 67.1% (n = 51) of patients identifying as male. On external validation, the baseline intensity algorithm was the only significant survival-prediction model (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.57-0.95; p = 0.011), outperforming baseline radiomics (AUC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.47-0.86; p = 0.100) and baseline volume (AUC = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37-0.74; p = 0.574). Radiomic prediction models stratified patients into distinct overall survival risk groups, with low-risk patients showing a median survival of 696 days versus 453 days (log-rank p = 0.0267). Integrating imaging features with laboratory variables improved lesion-level response assessment (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.66-0.99; p = 0.006), but did not enhance OS prediction. Lesion-level response was best identified by delta radiomics (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97; p = 0.008).
conclusionRadiomics-based machine learning models could predict overall survival in patients treated with irinotecan-TACE, offering a potential tool for patient selection. KEY POINTS: Question Can radiomics and machine learning predict outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with irinotecan-TACE, aiding in patient stratification and selection? Findings Baseline intensity features predicted overall survival (AUC = 0.79), while delta radiomics identified lesion response (AUC = 0.83) in a multicenter cohort. Clinical relevance These models can help identify patients likely to benefit from irinotecan-TACE and lesions most responsive to treatment. Further development would enable personalized therapy that may improve survival and reduce unnecessary interventions in non-responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.