ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
The timing of LIP remapping is consistent with a wave of activity and brings into question the relevance of the pre-saccadic remapped response.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Receptive-field remapping and trans-saccadic space updating.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintaining stable perception amid dynamic visual input driven by eye movements is a remarkable feat of the brain. One proposed mechanism underlying this phenomenon is receptive field remapping in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), in which neurons predictively update their receptive fields to compensate for eye movements. Models of remapping have suggested that the underlying mechanism may involve either a wave of activity or a single jump in activity. To test these competing hypotheses, we investigated the timing of remapping as a function of saccade length. We predicted that if remapping occurs through a jump, the remapped response will align more closely with saccade onset, independent of saccade length. Alternatively, if remapping involves a wave moving over time, we predicted that the remapped response would occur later for longer saccades when aligned by saccade onset. We recorded the activity of single LIP neurons and multiunit activity in animals performing a saccade task in which a probe appeared in the postsaccadic receptive field before a 7°, 14°, or 21° saccade. We found that responses to single neurons and to multiunits were all consistent with the wave hypothesis. Surprisingly, we also found that remapping responses starting before the saccade only occurred in conditions in which the probe was presented within the classical receptive field. These findings bring into question whether presaccadic remapped responses are a fundamental feature of LIP remapping and support the idea that the mechanism underlying remapping is driven by a wave of activity rather than a jump.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.