ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Apical Takotsubo Syndrome After Elective Stenting of the Left Anterior Descending Artery.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTakotsubo syndrome (TS) is a transient stress-induced left ventricular dysfunction that may clinically mimic acute myocardial infarction (MI). Its occurrence after percutaneous coronary intervention is rare, and it may be misinterpreted as a procedural complication, including type 4a MI. CASE SUMMARY: We describe a 77-year-old woman with stable coronary artery disease who developed apical TS shortly after elective stenting of the left anterior descending artery. Postprocedural chest pain and electrocardiographic changes raised suspicion of acute MI. However, coronary angiography demonstrated patent stent implantation without evidence of acute thrombosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed apical ballooning with myocardial edema in the absence of necrosis, consistent with TS. DISCUSSION: TS after percutaneous coronary intervention is an uncommon but important diagnostic consideration. Differentiation from periprocedural MI requires integration of clinical findings, coronary imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Recognition of this condition is essential to avoid unnecessary escalation of antithrombotic therapy and to guide appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.