ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2026
To the RESCUE: program fidelity and experiences of an Illinois stock inhaler program.
Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Resources for Schools Encountering Unexpected Asthma Emergencies-Illinois (RESCUE-IL) program-which provides stock inhalers, materials, and training-expanded to all Illinois public schools in its second year. A survey evaluated fidelity to emergency protocols and implementation experiences over the 2024-2025 school year as part of a larger program evaluation.
methodsThe 69-item survey was available to school staff (e.g. nurses, administrators, others) registered in the RESCUE-IL portal over February-March 2025. Questions were either respondent-specific (33 questions) or school-specific for up to three schools (12 questions per school).
resultsA total of 327 respondents representing 483 schools completed the survey (response rate = 20.6%). Nearly all (96.3%) reported satisfaction with RESCUE-IL over the second implementation year. While 93.9% felt the emergency protocol was effective, fewer were comfortable with the protocol-directed four puffs for mild-moderate distress (61.2%) or with eight puffs for severe distress (49.2%). Most (96.0%) preferred to start with two puffs and give more if necessary. Additionally, 76.2% of respondents preferred to follow a student's Asthma Action Plan (AAP) when available over the provided emergency protocol, contrary to RESCUE rules. Furthermore, 40.9% of schools who had used a stock inhaler and 23.7% of schools who had not (
conclusionsRespondents were satisfied with the program overall but had low comfort with dosages over two puffs outlined in the RESCUE-IL protocol, likely due to discrepancies with student AAPs, requiring further individual and group training. Increasing uptake of current AAP recommendations is a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.