Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053417›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2026

To the RESCUE: program fidelity and experiences of an Illinois stock inhaler program.

Paige Hardy, Anna Volerman, Alexandra Knitter, Erica Salem, Chris Martinez, Naomi Soto, Sam Weigley, Lynn B Gerald, Andrea A Pappalardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paige HardyUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anna VolermanUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexandra KnitterUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Erica SalemRespiratory Health Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Chris MartinezAllergy and Asthma Impact and Rescue, St Louis, MO, USA.
Naomi SotoAllergy and Asthma Impact and Rescue, St Louis, MO, USA.
Sam WeigleyAllergy and Asthma Impact and Rescue, St Louis, MO, USA.
Lynn B GeraldUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrea A PappalardoUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4901-3465

Funding

Policy to Practice: An Implementation Science-Based Approach to Stock Inhalers in SchoolsK23HL163253 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Andrea Pappalardo Wlochowicz · 2024 to 2026
$536k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL163253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Resources for Schools Encountering Unexpected Asthma Emergencies-Illinois (RESCUE-IL) program-which provides stock inhalers, materials, and training-expanded to all Illinois public schools in its second year. A survey evaluated fidelity to emergency protocols and implementation experiences over the 2024-2025 school year as part of a larger program evaluation.

methodsThe 69-item survey was available to school staff (e.g. nurses, administrators, others) registered in the RESCUE-IL portal over February-March 2025. Questions were either respondent-specific (33 questions) or school-specific for up to three schools (12 questions per school).

resultsA total of 327 respondents representing 483 schools completed the survey (response rate = 20.6%). Nearly all (96.3%) reported satisfaction with RESCUE-IL over the second implementation year. While 93.9% felt the emergency protocol was effective, fewer were comfortable with the protocol-directed four puffs for mild-moderate distress (61.2%) or with eight puffs for severe distress (49.2%). Most (96.0%) preferred to start with two puffs and give more if necessary. Additionally, 76.2% of respondents preferred to follow a student's Asthma Action Plan (AAP) when available over the provided emergency protocol, contrary to RESCUE rules. Furthermore, 40.9% of schools who had used a stock inhaler and 23.7% of schools who had not (

conclusionsRespondents were satisfied with the program overall but had low comfort with dosages over two puffs outlined in the RESCUE-IL protocol, likely due to discrepancies with student AAPs, requiring further individual and group training. Increasing uptake of current AAP recommendations is a priority.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaNebulizers and VaporizersSchool Health ServicesChildHumansIllinoisProgram EvaluationSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Asthmatic Agentsasthma action planimplementation scienceSchool healthschool nursing

Identifiers

PMID42053417
PMCPMC13206745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.