Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053379›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2026

Bayesian adaptive randomization in the I-SPY2 sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Peter Norwood, Christina Yau, Denise Wolf, Philip Beineke, Andrew Chapple, Anastasios Tsiatis, Marie Davidian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter NorwoodQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States.
Christina YauDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Denise WolfDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Philip BeinekeQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States.
Andrew ChappleQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States.
Anastasios TsiatisDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, United States.
Marie DavidianDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9202-6341

Funding

The I SPY 2.2 TRIAL: Evolving to Imaging and Molecular Biomarker Response Directed Adaptive Sequential Treatment to Optimize Breast Cancer OutcomesP01CA210961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nola M. Hylton-Watson · 2017 to 2026
$22.9M
Next-generation SMARTs for Discovery and Evaluation of Sequential Cancer Therapeutic StrategiesR01CA280970 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Eric Benjamin Laber · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA210961NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280970NIH HHS P01CA210961NIH HHS R01CA280970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I-SPY2 is a long-running phase 2 platform trial that evaluates neoadjuvant treatments for locally advanced breast cancer to identify those with high efficacy that are likely to be successful in phase 3 trials, assigning patients to novel agents using response-adaptive randomization (RAR). Recently, I-SPY2 was reconfigured as a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART), with up to three stages of therapy. At the first stage, a patient is assigned to a tumor-subtype-specific therapy. If the patient fails to show a satisfactory response, the patient is assigned to a second subtype-specific therapy, and receives a third, rescue therapy if response is still not achieved. The I-SPY2 SMART thus supports identification of highly efficacious entire treatment regimes. The transition of I-SPY2 to a SMART required development of a RAR scheme that updates randomization probabilities at each stage, aligned with the goal of maximizing the number of patients who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). We present our Bayesian RAR approach, which updates randomization probabilities based on the posterior probability that treatments are part of the optimal regime. Empirical studies demonstrate that it results in more patients having treatment experience consistent with highly efficacious regimes, improves overall within-trial pCR rates, and identifies optimal regimes post trial at rates similar to or exceeding those under simple, uniform, nonadaptive randomization.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBayes TheoremComputer SimulationFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeBayesian response-adaptive randomizationbreast cancerprecision oncologysequential multiple assignment randomized trial

Identifiers

PMID42053379
PMCPMC13126647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.