ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2026
Water-soluble swab material for environmental sampling.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological threats represent a growing vulnerability to national security, affecting both military and civilian populations. Deliberate dissemination of chemical and biological (CB) agents can have immediate and significant impacts on public health and the economy, highlighting the need for faster and more efficient techniques to assess contamination and safely clear affected areas for public reentry following an accidental or intentional biological release. Current surface sampling procedures set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) call for sampling swab materials that are not soluble in aqueous bacterial growth medium. These have been shown here to be inefficient, releasing less than 40% of the captured biological material into aqueous solution for detection. Since the CDC put these procedures in place, there has been no impetus for industry to develop sampling swabs that release 100% of the sample they capture from a non-porous surface. This project developed cost-effective, novel, biologically hospitable, adsorbent materials that dissolve in water, releasing 100% of the captured sample. These fibers maintain structural integrity during sampling, can be premoistened without premature dissolution, and rapidly dissolve in solution, facilitating efficient sample release. Forcespun PVA fibrous swabs demonstrated significantly higher spore capture and release efficiency compared to traditional materials, without inhibiting bacterial growth or spore germination. These swabs could significantly improve current sampling technologies and procedures via increased spore detection and analysis efficiency. Higher sampling efficiency could translate to fewer samples required for analysis and significantly less time to render an area safe for public reentry. Increased sampling efficiency would also provide faster impact data to decision makers and lead to improved consequence management. Prior to this study, water-soluble swabs suitable for this purpose have not yet been developed.IMPORTANCEAccurate environmental sampling is critical for detecting low-level microbial contamination in both public health and biodefense settings. Our water-soluble PVA swab material achieves up to 100% spore release from non-porous surfaces, more than double the recovery of traditional swabs, while being compatible with scalable, low-cost fabrication methods. This new tool will enable more sensitive, faster, and more reliable surface monitoring across a wide range of environmental and diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.