ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Biases in Cardiovascular Risk Perception: Psychological and Demographic Correlates: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding cardiovascular (CV) risk above a certain age is vital following a health-focused, balanced lifestyle. This cross-sectional study aims to identify distortions in CV perception and their potential predictors in a primary care sample. For 376 participants in Hungary, the Framingham cardiovascular risk score was calculated, and a questionnaire measuring demographic, medical, psychological characteristics, and perceived cardiovascular risk was administered. Analyses were conducted in a 3-group design comparing "realistic" (39%), "optimistic" (18%), and "pessimistic" (43%); (corresponding to accurate estimation, underestimation, and overestimation of calculated risk, respectively) perception groups. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the main predictors of "optimistic" perception were male sex (OR = 0.853;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.