ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Validity of influenza vaccine effectiveness calculations using a test-negative design in Thailand.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thailand uses a test-negative design to calculate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) annually for the Southern Hemisphere formulation and shares estimates with the World Health Organization to inform global vaccine strain selection. This study analyzed potential misclassification and confounding factors to evaluate validity of the test-negative design in Thailand. We retrospectively reviewed influenza sentinel surveillance data from June 2023 to May 2024 and gathered information on vaccination history and health-seeking behavior. Cases were medically attended illnesses with positive influenza test results; noncases had negative results for influenza and SARS-CoV-2. We compared VE using the routine approach with six scenarios, representing four potential threats to the validity of test-negative design studies. We assessed exposure (vaccination) misclassification, outcome (influenza) misclassification, and confounding by health-seeking behavior. Unmeasured confounding was evaluated by calculating VE against rhinovirus, an outcome unrelated to influenza vaccination. A total of 4709 patients were included, of which 328 (7.0%) were vaccinated against influenza. Under the routine approach, VE against medically attended influenza was 36.9% (95% CI, 13.5%-53.9%). In alternative scenarios, VE ranged from 32.4% to 42.8%, with overlapping 95% CIs. These findings support the validity of Thailand's VE estimates and can inform improvements in surveillance procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.