ArticleInternational wound journal2024
RETRACTED: The effect of placing drains and no drains after caesarean section in obese patients on patients' post-operative wound complications: A meta-analysis.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTION: The Effect of Placing Drains and No Drains After Caesarean Section in Obese Patients on Patients' Post-Operative Wound Complications: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: The effect of placing drains and no drains after caesarean section in obese patients on patients' post-operative wound complications: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of placement of drainage channels and non-drainage channels in obese women on post-caesarean delivery. Documents were retrieved from four databases, such as PubMed and Embase. This study was not limited in time, language, or geography. This trial was conducted using either a cohort or a randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy of placement of drain in caesarean delivery channel in obese women with or without drain for post-operative wound complications. The study excluded those who were restricted to those who were not overweight. The main results were the wound infection, the bleeding of the wound and the dehiscence. The risk of bias was evaluated by two authors with a risk-of-bias tool for nonrandomized intervention trials. The meta-analyses only included those that were considered to have a low-to-medium risk of bias. The data were pooled with a random-effects model to determine the relative risk and 95% confidence interval (CI). The quality of the evidence in the selection of results was evaluated. Of 329 related trials, eight were eligible for inclusion. There were 1868 cases of obesity who received C-section. Among them, there were 451 cases of drain and 1417 cases of non-drain. No statistical significance was found in the rate of post-operation infection of the post-operation between non-drain or drain treatment of obesity patients (OR, 0.8; 95% CI: 0.48-1.33; p = 0.39). Compared with those with non-drain, there was a reduction in the risk of haematoma after drain (OR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20-0.58; p < 0.0001). The results showed that there were no significant differences in the influence of drainage and non-drainage on the post-operative dehiscence of the patients with obesity (OR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.15-4.70; p = 0.85). The results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the rate of post-operation wound infection and dehiscence after operation, but the rate of haematoma during drain operation was lower.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.