ArticleInternational wound journal2024
RETRACTED: Application of continuing nursing intervention on wound infection and ulcers in patients with diabetic foot: A meta-analysis.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTION: Application of Continuing Nursing Intervention on Wound Infection and Ulcers in Patients With Diabetic Foot: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Application of continuing nursing intervention on wound infection and ulcers in patients with diabetic foot: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis systematically evaluates the impact of continuous nursing care interventions on wound infections and ulcerations in patients with diabetic foot. A comprehensive computerized search was conducted, from database inception to November 2023, in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the application of continuous nursing care in diabetic foot. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and conducted quality assessments based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 23 RCTs involving 1813 diabetic foot patients were included. The analysis revealed that, compared to standard care, the implementation of continuous nursing care significantly reduced the incidence of wound infections (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.15-0.32, p < 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.14-0.25, p < 0.001), as well as the occurrence of foot ulcers (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.35, p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the application of continuous nursing care in diabetic foot patients can effectively reduce the occurrence of wound infections, foot ulcers, and complications, thereby facilitating patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.