ArticleInternational wound journal2024
RETRACTED: Effect of bone grafting on postoperative wound infection and marginal necrosis in patients with calcane fractures.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTION: Effect of Bone Grafting on Postoperative Wound Infection and Marginal Necrosis in Patients With Calcane Fractures.International wound journal · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Effect of bone grafting on postoperative wound infection and marginal necrosis in patients with calcane fractures.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of bone-transplantation over nonbone transplantation in treating intra-articular fractures of the heel bone on postsurgical complications. Our results were retrieved from the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The data of the injury of the patient and the wound infection were collected. Study were carried out with Revman 5.3 software. Eight operative trials associated with the implant of the heel were selected from a large number of publications. Among the 804 cases that needed operation on the heel, 410 cases were treated with bone grafting while 394 cases were not treated with the operation. Seven trials showed that there was no difference in the risk of post operative wound infection among patients who had received a bone-grafting operation on the heel or had not (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.51, 1.49 p = 0.62). There was no difference in the risk for post-operation marginal necrosis among patients who had received a bone-grafting operation on the heel or had not (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42, 1.36 p = 0.34). The results of this show that there are no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post-operative necrosis and infection in the case of endarticular surgery of the heel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.